Orthodontics SEO in Nashville: Winning Keywords General Dentists Now Crowd

On this page

General dentists who offer clear aligners and braces compete with orthodontists for the same searches: “Invisalign Nashville,” “braces near me,” “clear aligners cost.” In Tennessee, the rules for how each can describe that work in advertising are not the same, and the difference is where an orthodontic practice can win. Under the Board of Dentistry’s advertising rule, only a licensee who holds the Board’s certification in a recognized specialty may advertise with the words “specialist,” “specialty,” “specializing,” or “practice limited to,” and “Board Certified” may appear only in connection with a recognized specialty. A general dentist who advertises work in a specialty branch of dentistry must instead state that “the services are being performed or provided by a general dentist,” as conspicuously as the branch of dentistry advertised (Tenn. Comp. R. & Regs. 0460-02-.10). The specialty branches are the ones listed in T.C.A. 63-5-112 and the Board’s rules; whether a particular general-dentist page, such as one for clear aligners, is advertising a listed branch is a question that practice settles against that list, and the statement is required where it is.

Use the words the rule reserves, accurately

An orthodontist who holds the Board’s specialty certification in a listed branch can say what a general dentist cannot: specialist, practice limited to orthodontics. Those words should appear where a patient comparing providers will see them: the page title area, the doctor’s bio, and the Business Profile description. They should be paired with the training behind them (the residency program and its length, and any board certification) stated exactly as issued.

The same rule cuts both ways. If an orthodontic practice also employs a general dentist who provides work in a listed specialty branch, the pages advertising that dentist’s work carry the general-dentist statement; and the rule says an advertisement may not state or imply that a certain licensee provides all services when some are performed by another licensee, so each page should name who does the work.

The rest of the rule applies to an orthodontic site as it does to any dental site: every advertisement carries the practice’s name, address, and telephone number and an authorized title such as D.D.S. or D.M.D.; an advertised fee follows the rule’s fee provisions (a fee range must disclose the factors that set the actual fee, and extra related services must be identified); testimonials must be reasonably verifiable and before-and-after results must not create an unjustified expectation; and a copy of each advertisement, including web pages as they change, is kept for two years. An orthodontic practice that advertises a “starting at” price for treatment, for example, needs the factors that move the final fee on the same page.

Pages for the case, not only the appliance

Searches for a brand of aligner can put the orthodontist in a list with every provider of that product. Searches about the problem (an overbite, crowding that returned after braces, a child’s crossbite) come from patients whose case may need more than aligners alone. Jaw pain is a different matter: the National Institute of Dental and Craniofacial Research says research does not support the belief that a bad bite or orthodontic treatment causes TMDs (NIDCR, TMD), so a page that mentions jaw pain should send the patient to an evaluation rather than present braces or aligners as the fix. Pages for each kind of case, explaining what an evaluation looks for, the treatment options, a realistic timeline in the practice’s experience, and what happens if the case is treated as purely cosmetic, can reach the patients whose decision depends on expertise rather than price.

The family decision

When the patient is a child, the decision belongs to parents, who often research before booking. A page about when a child should first be evaluated, what an early evaluation does and does not lead to, and how treatment fits around school and sports answers the questions parents bring. Clear information about consultations, payment plans, and insurance belongs on the same path.

Adult patients decide on different grounds. An adult may be correcting crowding that returned after treatment as a teenager, may want to know whether treatment can be discreet at work, and decides without a parent weighing in. A page for adults that answers those questions, separate from the parent’s page about a first check-up, lets each reader find their own case.

The specialty’s own association gives the parents’ page its anchor. The American Association of Orthodontists recommends that children have their first check-up with an orthodontist no later than age 7, when a mix of baby and permanent teeth lets the orthodontist recognize problems in their earliest stages; it stresses that a check-up is not the same as starting treatment and that only a few problems need correction around that age; and, asked whether parents should wait for their dentist to refer the child, it answers no (American Association of Orthodontists, child orthodontics FAQ). A practice page that repeats those points in its own words, says what its own first visit for a seven-year-old includes, and states plainly, as the AAO does, that only a few problems need correction at that age, can earn the trust of a parent who is wary of being sold braces early.

The same FAQ describes where the orthodontist’s difference comes from: dental school includes minimal orthodontic instruction, and the intensive training in tooth movement and jaw development comes in a post-dental school orthodontic residency. That is a sentence a parent comparing a specialist with a general dentist can understand, and it fits beside the Tennessee advertising rule’s reserved words.

Reviews from families over a long treatment

Orthodontic treatment can run for a year or more, so the reviews that help the next family describe the whole course: how appointments fit around school, how the office handled a broken bracket, how the result held up after the braces came off. Asking for a review on the day braces come off, when the family has seen the whole process, gathers that kind of account. Google’s policy does not allow offering a discount or a gift in exchange for a review (Google Maps user-contributed content policy), and replies should not discuss a patient’s treatment in public. Before-and-after photos need written consent from a parent for a minor patient and should be described as one patient’s result.

Profiles for the practice and the doctors

Google treats dentists as individual practitioners who can have their own Business Profiles, while asking a practice with several practitioners to keep a separate profile for the location, and not allowing one practitioner to hold several profiles for different specialties (Google’s guidelines for representing your business). An orthodontist’s profile is another place to state the specialty accurately, and another place the advertising rule applies.

Making the specialist visible

Every page that names an orthodontic service should say who provides it and whether that person holds the specialty certification. If a patient comparing two providers cannot tell from the page which one is the specialist, the page has not used the one advantage the rule gives.

Leave a comment

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *